However, some psychologists questioned this method of evaluating stressful events. They believed that the rarity of such events could not account for the recurring stress that people experience on a day-to-day basis. Instead of looking at major, life-changing events, they emphasised the effect of relatively minor everyday occurrences, which a person may consider stressful.
They also account for the stress caused by minor tensions with relatives and peers, such as engaging in dispute with a spouse or co-worker. Such positive encounters could include managing to catch the last bus home, receiving praise from a teacher or manager, or enjoying an easy commute to work.
Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire on a monthly basis to measure the hassles and uplifts that they had encountered. They were also asked to complete a life events questionnaire and a health-related questionnaire.
Delongis et al found that the hassles, as recalled by the participants, correlated negatively with their reported health. Furthermore, stress arising from the pressure of daily hassles may help to explain certain types of behavior. Participants in the study were asked to report daily hassles by completing a questionnaire on a monthly basis. For instance, they may forget hassles which resulted in little stress, or misattribute stress to a specific hassle even though other factors were involved.
Given the extensive inventory of hassles included in the initial hassles scale, it was impractical to ask participants to complete the questionnaire on a more frequent basis. In , Delongis produced a more concise version of the Hassles and Uplifts scale Delongis et al, Previous daily hassle studies have also attempted to establish the experience of a demanding situation as being a cause of stress.
Instead, they reveal a correlation between daily hassles and stress, without proving a cause-and-effect link between the two. For example, a woman may report feeling stressed when delayed on her commute to work.
Whilst she may attribute this to the delay, it may be that she would not have felt as stressed had other hassles prior to the delay not occurred. A further criticism of daily hassles is that it assumes that individuals will respond to stress in a similar way. However, people tend to cope differently in stressful situations, and a hassle which is a burden to one person may be experienced in a different way by another. Individual differences may be observed in the way that people adapt in stressful situations.
For example, a man starting a new job may become stressed when he is assigned a heavy workload. However, someone who has previously worked in a more demanding position may perceive the workload to be less of a hassle.
Which Archetype Are You? Discover which Jungian Archetype your personality matches with this archetype test. Are You Angry? Take our 5-minute anger test to find out if you're angry!
Windows to the Soul What can a person's eyes tell you about what they are thinking? Are You Stressed? Measure your stress levels with this 5-minute stress test.
Underload and overload in working life: Outline of a multidisciplinary approach. Human Stress 2: 35— Friedman, M. Gersten, J. Child behavior and life events: Undesirable change or change per se? In Dohrenwend, B. Glass, D. Gough, H. The ACL as a personality assessment research technique. Hinkle, L. Hochstim, J. Health and ways of living. In Kessler, I. Holmes, T. Life change and illness susceptibility. The social readjustment rating scale.
Horowitz, M. Life events questionnaires for measuring presumptive stress. Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Hough, R. Problems in the ratio measurement of life stress. James, S. Socioecologic stress and hypertension-related mortality rates in North Caroline.
Public Health 66 4 : — Jenkins, C. Kahn, R. Kanner, A. Hassles and uplifts subscales: An analysis of meaning-centered versus cumulative effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Uplifts, hassles, and a little androgyny. Conspicuous in its absence: The lack of positive conditions as a source of stress.
Human Stress 4: 33— Kaplan, H. Social psychology of disease. In Freeman, H. Lazarus, R. The stress and coping paradigm. In Eisdorfer, C. Environmental stress. In Altman, I. Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In Pervin, L. Psychological stress and adaptation: Some unresolved issues. In Selye, H. Emotions: A cognitive-phenomenological analysis. In Plutchik, R. Levine, S.
Social Stress , Aldine, Chicago. Lewinsohn, P. Studies of the measurement of unpleasant events and relations with depression. Lowenthal, M. Social stress and adaptation: Toward a lifecourse perspective.
American Psychological Association, Washington, D. Luborsky, L. Onset conditions for psychosomatic symptoms: A comparative review of immediate observation with retrospective research. McLean, P. Depression as a specific response to stress.
Mechanic, D. Discussion of research programs on relations between stressful life events and episodes of physical illness. Mueller, D. Stressful life events and psychiatric symptomatology: Change or undesirability? Myers, J. Social class, life events, and psychiatric symptoms: A longitudinal study. Nofsinger, E. Novaco, R. Transportation, stress and community psychology.
Pearlin, L. Sex roles and depression. In Datan, N. Status inequality and stress in marriage. Social sources of emotional distress. In Simmons, J. Holmes, T. The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of psychosomatic research, 11, Kanner, A. Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of behavioral medicine , 4 1 , Rahe, R.
Prediction of near-future health change from subjects' preceding life changes. Journal of Psychosomatic Research , 14 4 , McLeod, S.
SRRS - stress of life events.
0コメント