Violin plots with box plots superimposed of the time-to-click for the younger participants recruited via SONA and the older participants recruited via mTurk who indicated that they experienced the speech to song illusion.
Discussion In Study 3, we used time-to-click on a button to indicate when listeners varying in age experienced the perceptual shift from speech to song that occurs in the Speech-to-Song Illusion. General discussion The results of three surveys failed to support our hypothesis of an age-related difference in experiencing the Speech-to-Song Illusion.
Supporting information. S1 Data. References 1. Castro N. An account of the speech to song illusion using node structure theory. PloS one, 13 6 , e Regaiolli B. Motion illusions as environmental enrichment for zoo animals: A preliminary investigation on lions panthera leo.
Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Gregory R. Perceptual illusions and brain models. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.
Series B, Biological Sciences, , — Mullennix J. An examination of the Kuleshov effect using still photographs. Deutsch D. The speech-to-song illusion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, , View Article Google Scholar 6. Falk S. Speech Prosody , , 1—4. View Article Google Scholar 7. Tierney A. Speech versus song: Multiple pitch-sensitive areas revealed by a naturally occurring musical illusion. Cerebral Cortex, 23, — Vitevitch M. Phonological but not semantic influences on the speech-to-song illusion.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Soehlke L. The influence of memory on the speech-to-song illusion. Unpublished manuscript submitted for publication. View Article Google Scholar MacKay D. The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag. Burke D. On the tip-of-the-tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, — Huijbers W.
Age-related increases in tip-of-the-tongue are distinct from decreases in remembering names: a functional MRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 27 9 , — Cognition and aging: A theory of new learning and the use of old connections. In Hess T. Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization p.
Sommers M. Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Hadad B. Developmental trends in susceptibility to perceptual illusions: Not all illusions are created equal. When speech sounds like music.
Groenveld G. I still hear a melody: investigating temporal dynamics of the Speech-to-Song Illusion. Psychological Research 84, — Hymers M. J, et al. Neural mechanisms underlying song and speech perception can be differentiated using an illusory percept. NeuroImage, , — Jaisin K. Non-Tonal Languages.
Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Margulis E. Pronunciation difficulty, temporal regularity, and the speech-to-song illusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Rowland J. There is music in repetition: Looped segments of speech and nonspeech induce the perception of music in a time-dependent manner. Acoustic foundations of the speech-to-song illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, , — Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden C.
Everyday musical experience is sufficient to perceive the speech-to-song illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, , e43—e Finding the music of speech: Musical knowledge influences pitch processing in speech. Cognition, , — Buhrmester M. Perspectives on psychological science, 6 1 , 3—5. Armitage J. Reaction time data in music cognition: Comparison of pilot data from lab, crowdsourced, and convenience web samples.
Lin F. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. What predicts the own-age bias in face recognition memory?. Sporer, S. Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups. Public Policy Law 7 , 36—97 Bernstein, M.
The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Hugenberg, K. Holistic processing is tuned for in-group faces.
Wiese, H. Ageing faces in ageing minds: A review on the own-age bias in face recognition. Rhodes, M. The own-age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review.
Dunning, D. Wishful seeing: How preferences shape visual perception. Riccio, M. Seeing the expected, the desired, and the feared: Influences on perceptual interpretation and directed attention. Compass 7 , — Clark, A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Brain Sci. Vetter, P. Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception. Tversky, A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.
Science , — Mintz, E. An example of assimilative projection. Psychol 52 , — Ebbesen, E. Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Vestlund, J. Experts on age estimation.
Voelkle, M. Let me guess how old you are: Effects of age, gender, and facial expression on perceptions of age. Aging 27 , — Watson, T. Who are you expecting? Biases in face perception reveal prior expectations for sex and age. Google Scholar. Mussweiler, T. Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Clifford, C. Two sources of bias explain errors in facial age estimation.
Open Sci. Verheyen, S. Subjectivity in gradable adjectives: The case of tall and heavy. Mind Lang. Holyoak, K. Social reference points. Robbins, J. Social projection to in groups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Firestone, C. Champely, S. R package version 1.
Georgiades, M. Biasing effects in ambiguous figures: Removal or fixation of critical features can affect perception. Shakhnazarova, N. Old or Young? R Core Team R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Morey, R. R package version 0. Wickham, H. Arnold, J. R package version 4.
Auguie, B. R package version 2. Navarro, D. Version 0. Murphy, N. Age effects and gaze patterns in recognising emotional expressions: An in-depth look at gaze measures and covariates. Botwinick, J. Husband and father-in-law: A reversible figure.
Reorganization of perceptions with age. Jeffreys, H. Theory of Probability Oxford University Press, Wagenmakers, E. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem Kawabata, N. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Unfortunately, the subsamples of individual countries were too small to make meaningful comparisons. For example, respondents from China 0. We expand on the question of testing cultural differences in the section Discussion. In the current study, we analyzed the raw ages that participants provided in order to maintain interpretational consistency across models and outcomes. However, previous researchers have also expressed subjective age as a discrepancy score i.
We re-ran the models with these two metrics of subjective age; these results can be found in Supplementary Tables 4, 5 and Supplementary Figures 1, 2. Their interpretation is consistent to what is reported in the main text and in Figure 1.
Specifically, as individuals age, they report increasingly younger subjective ages relative to their chronological age. Abrams, D. Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. Barrett, A. Aging Hum. Explaining age differences in women's emotional well-being: the role of subjective experiences of aging. Women Aging 28, — Gendered perceptions of aging: an examination of college students.
Blau, Z. Changes in status and age identification. Braithwaite, V. Google Scholar. Brown, R. Evaluation of an evolutionary model of self-preservation and self-destruction. Suicide Life Threaten. PubMed Abstract Google Scholar.
Burnstein, E. Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Cesario, J. The ecology of automaticity how situational contingencies shape action semantics and social behavior. Chopik, W. Death across the lifespan: age differences in death-related thoughts and anxiety. Death Stud. Age differences in romantic attachment around the world. From the cradle to the grave: age differences in attachment from early adulthood to old age.
Age differences in explicit and implicit age attitudes across the life span. Gerontologist 57 Suppl. Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries.
Cross Cult. Christian, J. Does intergenerational contact reduce ageism: when and how contact interventions actually work? Arts Hum. Cohen, J. The cost of dichotomization.
Duncan, L. Prejudicial attitudes toward older adults may be exaggerated when people feel vulnerable to infectious disease: evidence and implications. Issues Pub. Policy 9, 97— Freund, A. Beyond age comparisons: a plea for the use of a modified brunswikian approach to experimental designs in the study of adult development and aging. Galambos, N. Dating, sex, and substance use predict increases in adolescents' subjective age across two years.
Chronological and subjective age in emerging adulthood: the crossover effect. Harzing, A. Response styles in cross-national survey research: a country study.
Hasher, L. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. Heckhausen, J. Developmental expectations for the self and most other people: age grading in three functions of social comparison. Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Jensen, G. Aged appearance and behavior: an evolutionary and ethological perspective. Gerontologist 20 5 Pt 1 , — Karni, E. Self-preservation as a foundation of rational behavior under risk. Kastenbaum, R. Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A. Self-perceptions of aging: do subjective age and satisfaction with aging change during old age? Series B 63, P—P Self-perceptions of aging predict mortality and change with approaching death: year longitudinal results from the berlin aging study.
Aging 24, — Kuper, H. Intimations of mortality: perceived age of leaving middle age as a predictor of future health outcomes within the whitehall II study. Age Ageing 32, — Kurzban, R. Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: the functions of social exclusion.
Lai, C. Reducing implicit prejudice. Compass 7, — Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Lang, F. I accept. Take action on UpLink. Forum in focus. Our first-ever health hubs are accelerating value-based health care globally. Read more about this project.
Explore context. Explore the latest strategic trends, research and analysis. Age differences in age perceptions. The transposed line in A,B,D represent the identify line for individual age and the age for each dependent variable. C did not follow the response pattern of A,B,D with participants reporting that they would like to live to at least 88 yrs old on average; thus, the transposed line is not provided.
Have you read?
0コメント